| Study/Settings | Study Design/methods | Study Population | Intervention | Outcomes/Results | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashida et al. [101] |
Design: Cross-sectional Data: 20-45minute survey |
n=81 mothers; 80% AA; City in the South | Receiving supportive vs. undermining BF information from social networks | Participants who received more supportive than undermining BF advice were more likely to ever BF | Very Low |
| Thomas et al. [102] |
Design: Cross-sectional Data: two 5-min surveys for mothers & accompanying person | n=192 mothers; 101 with accompanying adult | Mothers with vs. mothers without accompanying person | Mothers with accompanying person more likely to EBF | Low |
| Wilhelm et al. [103] |
Design: RCT Data: 3 d, 2, 6 wks pp. surveys and 6 months phone interview. | n=26 intervention; n=27 controls; All H | BF motivational interviewing session at 3 d, 2 & 3 wks pp. | No between-group differences 3 BF at 6 mo | Very Low |